- #Foobar2000 skins 2018 install
- #Foobar2000 skins 2018 mod
- #Foobar2000 skins 2018 drivers
- #Foobar2000 skins 2018 skin
First thing is to erase whatever element is here by default (NG Playlist normally) and to insert an horizontal or vertical splitter as a base, or a PSS (right click/insert). Otherwise, you can decide to use Photoshop or Gimp or any other program to create images that you'll assemble using Panel Stack Splitter. If you're good at coding and you're not too ambitious, you can stick with foobar2000's code to create graphic elements.Just copy the core files (database etc.) from an installation to the other to keep your library and media player settings.
#Foobar2000 skins 2018 install
#Foobar2000 skins 2018 skin
Beware the updating of components, which can disable a part of or the entire skin however it doesn't happen a lot 'cause AFAIK no component is currently under development. That being said, if you've checked the components and their version and there's no conflict, you sure can install several skins on a single foobar2000.
#Foobar2000 skins 2018 mod
#Foobar2000 skins 2018 drivers
With my old Asus Xonar D1 I am pretty much stuck in shared mode (long story - newer drivers won't init the card properly, the ASIO driver in the older ones is allergic to CPU load, and WASAPI exclusive is not implemented properly). The obsession with bit-perfect audio still stems from the pre-Vista days, it is not actually truly required unless you are using DSD over PCM and other "repackaged" digital data streams (AC-3, DTS). There is a hard-limiter at an amplitude of 0.985 and that's about it. If you can keep digital levels just a hair below 0 dBFS and adjust sound device sample rate manually as needed, there should not be any loss in quality when using shared mode (BTW - there is a WASAPI shared mode addon for Foobar2000 as well, which comes standard with 1.6). Sorry if this post is a mess but if you've read it and have time to give an elaborate answer, please do. Or maybe I was fooling myself for a long time, thinking that WASAPI is "cleaner" and DirectSound is the same? I can definitely live without a system wide equalizer, just using parametric eq in foobar2000 but it would also be convenient to maintain one preset for all cases. Or maybe I am completely wrong and it actually does bypass it, just showing wrong numbers on display.
I want to understand why do such big databases of presets for APO exist if it doesn't even support "bit-perfect" mode to bypass Windows mixer.
In these cases samplerate is always showing correctly. Usually I use "WASAPI event" mode in foobar2000 and "WASAPI exclusive" when I watch videos in mpv or mpc. But after trying a new APO install I can only see Windows mixer samplerate on my D10s display. After some searching I found a post where user explains that APO is using it's own sound processing which isn't affected by DirectSound. For quite some time I was under the impression that EqApo just doesn't work on my computer but it actually just doesn't work with WASAPI.